PREFACE

I have a problem.

There are about 10 very concise topics about which I want to write desperately. once I'll have written about them, though, the finished piece will be posted and thus carved into the stoney brain of the internet.

It will be some kind of eternal speech of what I think. Despite the fact that indeed i'll be able to change or rewrite it anytime I want to.

These topics, they are a part of myself. The words and letters I will use to express my thoughts about them are like a new DNA. These are not my raisons d'être but they inspire them.

They inspire my daily life and have inspired a lot of what I did and what I am going to do. It's hard to let got. carving out the exact rows of letters, which ought to encode my passions and sentiments, the movements of my heart and my soul and my brain.

one year ago at a school seminar a franciscan read us a story.

[meta note: to write this sentence makes me proud.]

[hyper-meta note: writing this meta note makes me look like a selfconfident arrogant dull turd.]

the story centered around 4 elementary things in live. you gotta go and dwell into something. go. you gotta follow the star. see the star. you gotta stay wake. wake up.

and I can't remember what the fourth thing was.

a) or b) ?

The question is:
a) Do my posts look and read as if I didn't care about them BECAUSE none seems to read them anyway?
or
b) Does none read my posts BECAUSE my posts look and read as if I didn't care about them?

If the questions weren't about the lameness and thus non existence of readers it wouldn't be ridiculous to ask for answers in this multiple choice test.

The reason of all speechlessness

hucksblog.blogspot.com

This blog is not just funny and offers incredibly entertaining writing. It's also featuring a lot of insight on how a screenwriter can deal with crimson ape agents, dumb fucking lesbian agents, asian actors, boywonder directors.
It is as if Josh Friedman, the author (also of the first draft of WAR OF THE WORLDS) is unfolding little movie episodes before your eyes as you read his blog entries.

I'm personally involved into two different virtual worlds of fandom.

No.1: The german internet gatherings of fans of three investigators books and audio tapes. Here people are german and talk german.
It occasionally occurs that I have confusions in language because i'm constantly switching from german language to
anglo american websites:
No.2: The internet community inhabited by star wars geeks, chewers. comic shop clerks, people who read the simarillionpeople who use to type first into their subject box, browncoats, trolls, plants, people who claim to know someone whose friend works at ranch, people who know somone who knows the indy4 script and says the darabont draft was better, people who are making , people who own more than a thousand dvds (not me), people who were inspired by steven spielberg (me) , folks who share the deep love to movies and filmmaking.

In Josh Friedman's blog these two worlds collided when he was mentioning the three investigators in one of his posts. That was quite a clash- experience for my part.